µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÁÂ
  CF·Î ¹è¿ì´Â¿µ¾î
  »ýÈ°¼ÓÇ¥Çö
  ¿µ¾î´º½º
  ¿Àµð¿À*ºñµð¿À ¼ö¾÷
  ¿À´ÃÀÇ µ¿¿µ»ó
  °­»ç°¡ µé·ÁÁÖ´Â ±ÝÁÖÀÇ ¸í¾ð
Ȩ > °í°´¼¾ÅÍ > ¿µ¾î´º½º   
 
Revising Classic Novels
°ü¸®ÀÚ 2023-09-12 ¿ÀÈÄ 12:56:36 17054

 

Revising Classic Novels



These days, there is a controversy surrounding the issue of revising classic novels. Namely, some changes are being made to have them conform to current social norms. For example, famous stories by Roald Dahl, Agatha Christie, and Ian Fleming have been reworked to take out language and content that modern audiences might find offensive.

Supporters of revising classic novels say it is necessary to address inappropriate content. Others, however, claim that revisions can alter the intent of the authors and even lead to censorship.

Proponents of revising classic novels argue that these changes are essential to promoting cultural sensitivity* and reducing harmful stereotypes. By updating these works, readers from diverse backgrounds can enjoy the stories without feeling alienated or offended. In addition, it shows a commitment to inclusivity, allowing classic literature to remain accessible to a broader audience.

These supporters also assert that making revisions does not ruin the original story. Rather, it allows more people to appreciate the books while keeping them relevant. Moreover, these people say because the underlying themes and messages remain intact, they can resonate with readers while honoring the creative talent of the authors.

On the other hand, opponents argue that revising classic novels distorts the author's original intent and leads to historical inaccuracy. These novels are products of their time and provide valuable insights into past cultures and attitudes. This, opponents say, is crucial for allowing us to avoid repeating the same mistakes in the future.

Critics say that another concern is the ¡°slippery slope.¡± Subjective decisions about what is offensive could lead to stricter censorship and alter the originality of literary works. As a result, other creative efforts, such as paintings, films, or music, could become potential targets for revisions in the future.

Questions:
1. Why are some classic novels being revised in modern times?
2. What is the argument of those who support revising classic novels?
3. What concerns do opponents of revising classic novels have?
4. According to critics, what might be the potential consequences of revising classic novels?

5. Do you think revising classic novels to match modern social norms is a good idea? Why or why not? How important is it to preserve the originality and historical context of classic literature? Should revisions be limited to certain aspects of the content? 


÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ Not exist uploaded file.
Affirmative Action Outlawed at U.S. Universities
Korean Adoptees Gather in Seoul